The Ethics of Advertising Alcoholic Drinks Such as Beer and Cigarettes
Abstract
Advertising is a powerful tool that influences social norms, consumer behavior, and lifestyle choices. The ethicality of advertising potentially harmful products, such as alcoholic beverages and cigarettes, has long been debated among policymakers, health professionals, and ethicists. This post critically examines the ethical dimensions of advertising beer and tobacco, drawing upon utilitarian, deontological, and social responsibility frameworks. It evaluates how such advertising conflicts with public health objectives, manipulates vulnerable populations, and perpetuates social harm despite legal regulation. The analysis concludes that advertising alcohol and tobacco raises profound ethical concerns due to its manipulation of vulnerable audiences, distortion of informed consent, and contribution to preventable diseases.
1. Introduction
Advertising plays a vital role in shaping public perception and consumer choices. However, when used to promote products that are harmful to health, such as beer and cigarettes, it raises complex ethical questions. According to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2018), alcohol and tobacco together account for over 12 million deaths annually worldwide. Despite growing awareness of their health risks, aggressive marketing continues to normalize their consumption, particularly among young people.
Ethical advertising requires a balance between corporate freedom and social responsibility. The central question is whether it is morally defensible to promote products that, when consumed as intended, cause addiction, disease, and social harm (Hastings, 2012).
2. Ethical Frameworks for Evaluating Alcohol and Tobacco Advertising
2.1. Utilitarian Perspective
From a utilitarian standpoint, ethical actions are those that maximize overall happiness and minimize harm. The advertising of beer and cigarettes fails this test because the aggregate social harm—including disease, addiction, and economic burden—far outweighs individual or corporate benefits (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013).
While proponents argue that advertising provides consumer information and supports economic growth, studies show that exposure to such ads increases consumption, particularly among adolescents and non-users (Anderson et al., 2009; Lovato et al., 2011). Therefore, utilitarian ethics would condemn such advertising for promoting behaviors that lead to public health crises.
2.2. Deontological Ethics
Deontological theories, rooted in Kantian philosophy, emphasize duty and moral principles over consequences. From this view, it is inherently unethical to encourage behavior known to cause harm, regardless of profit motives. Advertisers of beer and cigarettes violate the moral duty of nonmaleficence—the obligation to avoid causing harm (Kant, 1785/1993).
Additionally, misleading advertisements that associate beer with social success or cigarettes with freedom undermine autonomy by manipulating consumer choices through false ideals (Harris & Sanborn, 2014).
2.3. Virtue and Social Responsibility Ethics
Virtue ethics emphasize moral character and social responsibility. Corporations that promote harmful substances cannot be considered virtuous actors within society. The UN Global Compact (2004) encourages businesses to operate ethically and avoid practices detrimental to human welfare. Advertising beer and cigarettes contradicts this ethos by prioritizing profit over the health of consumers.
3. Advertising, Vulnerability, and Public Health
3.1. Targeting Youth and Vulnerable Groups
Advertising for beer and cigarettes often targets young people, who are psychologically and neurologically vulnerable to influence (Anderson et al., 2009). Studies show that exposure to alcohol and tobacco ads during adolescence significantly increases the likelihood of early initiation and addiction (Pierce et al., 2010; Morgenstern et al., 2014).
Marketing strategies exploit youth desires for social acceptance and independence. For instance, beer advertisements frequently link drinking with masculinity, friendship, and celebration (Atkin et al., 2011), while cigarette ads historically associated smoking with sophistication and rebellion (Brandt, 2007). Such portrayals are deceptive and unethical, as they conceal health consequences behind emotional appeal.
3.2. Misleading Health and Lifestyle Messaging
Beer and tobacco advertisers have used implicit health claims, such as promoting “light” beer or “low-tar” cigarettes, misleading consumers into believing these products are less harmful. Empirical research shows these products are equally dangerous (Hastings, 2012). Ethically, this constitutes deceptive advertising, violating consumer rights to truthful information (Rawwas, 2001).
3.3. Public Health Burden
The societal cost of diseases related to alcohol and tobacco far outweighs the profits earned from their sales. The World Bank (2020) estimated that alcohol misuse costs economies 2–5% of GDP annually due to healthcare expenses and productivity loss. Similarly, tobacco-related illnesses cause immense strain on public health systems. Advertising that encourages such consumption directly contributes to these burdens and undermines public health ethics (WHO, 2018).
4. Regulatory and Ethical Dilemmas
4.1. Corporate Free Speech vs. Public Welfare
Corporations often defend their right to advertise under the principle of freedom of speech. However, this freedom must be weighed against social harm. Ethical theories and public health ethics prioritize the right to health over commercial expression when the two conflict (Gostin & Wiley, 2016).
4.2. Partial Restrictions and Self-Regulation
While many countries have banned tobacco advertising entirely, alcohol advertising often remains partially regulated. Self-regulation within the alcohol industry, such as voluntary codes of conduct, has proven largely ineffective (Nicholls, 2012). Ethical advertising requires transparent accountability mechanisms and public interest oversight, not industry-driven standards.
5. Case Examples
5.1. Tobacco Advertising Bans
Comprehensive bans on tobacco advertising have shown clear public health benefits. Following the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC, 2003), countries that implemented strict bans observed significant reductions in smoking initiation rates among youth (WHO, 2018).
5.2. Alcohol Advertising and Sports Sponsorship
Beer companies frequently sponsor sports events, linking drinking with health, vitality, and teamwork—an ethically problematic association (Babor et al., 2013). Such sponsorship blurs the boundary between healthy behavior and risky consumption, creating moral tension between commercial gain and youth influence.
6. Ethical Alternatives and Recommendations
To align with ethical and public health principles, several actions are recommended:
-
Comprehensive Advertising Restrictions: Similar to tobacco bans, alcohol advertising—especially of beer—should face strict regulation, particularly in media accessible to minors.
-
Transparent Warning Labels: Beer advertising should include clear health warnings, similar to cigarette packs, highlighting risks such as liver disease, cancer, and addiction.
-
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Beverage and tobacco companies must shift focus from persuasive marketing to harm reduction initiatives.
-
Ethical Oversight: Independent ethics committees should oversee marketing content, ensuring that advertisements align with human rights and health protection standards.
7. Conclusion
Advertising alcoholic beverages and cigarettes raises deep ethical concerns rooted in the conflict between corporate profit and public welfare. From utilitarian, deontological, and virtue-ethical perspectives, such advertising is largely indefensible, as it exploits vulnerable consumers, misrepresents health risks, and contributes to global disease burdens. Governments, advertisers, and society share a collective moral responsibility to restrict, regulate, or eliminate marketing practices that promote harmful consumption. Upholding ethical integrity in advertising is not merely a legal necessity but a moral imperative for safeguarding public health.
References
- Anderson, P., de Bruijn, A., Angus, K., Gordon, R., & Hastings, G. (2009). Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agn115
- Atkin, C. K., McCardle, M., & Newell, S. J. (2011). The role of advertising in consumer socialization to alcohol use among young people. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.1.50
- Babor, T. F., Robaina, K., Jernigan, D., Noel, J., & Vendrame, A. (2013). The influence of alcohol marketing on drinking behavior in young people: A systematic review. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 35(1), 19–29.
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Brandt, A. M. (2007). The cigarette century: The rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America. Basic Books.
- Gostin, L. O., & Wiley, L. F. (2016). Public health law: Power, duty, restraint (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
- Harris, J., & Sanborn, M. D. (2014). The paradox of marketing “healthy” choices: Ethics of promoting alcohol and tobacco with misleading imagery. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1894-9
- Hastings, G. (2012). Why corporate power is bad for health. London: Routledge.
- Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals (J. W. Ellington, Trans.). Hackett. (Original work published 1785).
- Lovato, C., Watts, A., & Stead, L. F. (2011). Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10, CD003439. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003439.pub2
- Nicholls, J. (2012). Everyday, everywhere: Alcohol marketing and social media—Current trends. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 47(4), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/ags043
- Pierce, J. P., White, V. M., & Emery, S. L. (2010). What public health strategies are needed to reduce smoking initiation? Tobacco Control, 21(2), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.039727
- Rawwas, M. Y. (2001). Culture, personality and morality: A typology of international consumers' ethical beliefs. International Marketing Review, 18(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330110389958
- World Bank. (2020). The economic cost of alcohol misuse. World Bank Group.
- World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. WHO Press.
